We started by wondering what it means now that AI is on the scene as a source of information and knowledge for schooling. We posed a conjecture leading up to how it would change the teaching role.
We were also curious as to what schools and districts would have to do to ensure they can use teachers more efficiently and to their greatest potential as humans because the teacher shortage is so severe.
We found that the new imperative is a pre-built course structure rather than traditional schooling structure with each teacher building each lesson independently and autonomously, sometimes with widely different pacing among same-grade and even same-subject teachers.
With AI on the scene, administration needs to be top-down providing pre-built lessons end-to-end in courses with human teachers used differently to personalize learning. Schooling may not even be whole group anymore, but we think it will definitely be still at least partially in-person.
We think having a pre-built course structure is an imperative to save teacher sanity. Plus 60% of teachers Learning Counsel surveyed last August want full courses rather than a build-your-own lessons approach.
We asked ChatGPT this Question:
Let's say a district created a curriculum that covered every grade and subject with fully built courses, each internally having all the lessons needed for the term of study if its quarterly, by semester or annually and every lesson had it's listed use of edtech whether for student study independently like doing a module in courseware or online quiz and what the teacher should do for any formal lesson. This organized the full pathways of any teaching and learning such that the teacher does not have to build the lessons, but only ensures the student is progressing nicely and "gets it" -- characterize the teachers role now as different than traditional schooling, especially with AI now on the scene.
ChatGPT said:
Detailed characterization of how the teacher’s role transforms when:
- A district provides a fully built curriculum for all grades and subjects.
- Every lesson includes integrated edtech tools and teacher actions.
- AI supports diagnostics, feedback, and personalization.
🧠 The Transformed Role of the Teacher in a Fully Built, AI-Enhanced Curriculum System
When districts provide a comprehensive, pre-built curriculum—complete with internal lessons, structured pacing, and clearly mapped uses of educational technology—the teacher no longer serves as the architect of daily content.
Instead, the role is redefined and elevated into that of a learning strategist, mentor, and human-centered guide, especially as artificial intelligence joins the classroom ecosystem.
📘 Traditional Teacher Role (Pre-Built Curriculum & Pre-AI)
| Aspect | Traditional Role |
|---|---|
| Lesson Design | Creates units, daily plans, assessments manually |
| Instruction | Primary content deliverer (lectures, direct teaching) |
| Assessment & Feedback | Manually grades work and tracks progress |
| Differentiation | Limited, often ad hoc or time-restricted |
| Tech Use | Varies by teacher; often fragmented or inconsistent |
| Role Identity | "Sage on the Stage" – content master and authority |
| Time Use | Dominated by prep, grading, and behavior management |
| Aspect | Modern Role in AI-Enhanced Curriculum Environment |
|---|---|
| Lesson Design | Content is pre-built and aligned; no need to create lessons |
| Instruction | Facilitator of learning; leverages AI and digital courseware |
| Assessment & Feedback | AI delivers instant feedback; teacher provides nuance and support |
| Differentiation | AI flags learners for support; teacher customizes interventions |
| Tech Use | Structured and purposeful; aligned across grade levels |
| Role Identity | "Guide on the Side" and "Mentor of Learning Behavior" |
| Time Use | Spent diagnosing, coaching, motivating, and refining instruction |
💡 New Role Dimensions in the AI Era
1. 🧭 Learning Coach & Progress Monitor
- Ensures students stay on track, understand content, and persist through challenges.
- Uses built-in data tools to track real-time progress.
2. 🧬 Diagnostic Strategist
- Interprets AI-generated analytics to identify who needs intervention or enrichment.
- Makes human decisions about when to intervene, reteach, or extend.
3. 🧑🏫 Personalized Support Guide
- Adapts the pre-set curriculum based on AI insights and learner needs.
- Focuses on differentiation through human empathy and strategy.
4. 🧠 Mentor of Learning Behaviors
- Coaches executive function, self-regulation, motivation, and self-efficacy.
- Anchors the emotional and social experience of the learner.
5. ⚖️ Ethical AI Facilitator
- Teaches students how to use AI tools responsibly.
- Ensures AI outputs are interpreted meaningfully and critically by students.
6. 🕊️ Relationship Builder
- Maintains human connection as a key driver of engagement and growth.
- Offers care and cultural awareness that technology cannot replace.
🧩 Summary: Human-AI Collaboration in the Classroom
AI handles content. Teachers handle cognition, connection, and care.
This system elevates teachers from task-driven roles to purpose-driven ones—freeing them to be experts in student growth, not curriculum mechanics.
We love this new mantra and definition of teacher: Cognition, Connection & Care.
The problem is, over 90 percent of administrators do not yet understand this new imperative and stop at the classroom door, thinking to “empower” teachers with thousands of Apps and systems so that teachers can remain the source of knowledge – because technology is “only a tool.” Along the way they accumulate massive costs in both technology expenditures and a loss to learning controls because every part of learner’s journey is particular to any one teacher. This ancient bureaucratic perspective completely misses the point of going digital by continuing to distribute through only nominally defined constriction points, humans, rather than directly, to free the human teachers to be more human. Given the state of play in schools today with 40 percent or more students of mixed ability, meaning well off the grade band they are supposed to be in, and the aforementioned shortage of teachers, the gift of AI and a rearrangement of duties to lean more on technology is screamingly obvious.
It’s time to build or buy the full branded courses, to normalize the progress paths and create continuity of operations first for core subjects and then everything else. After that, a multiplicity of side paths to manage personalization within courses will further help teachers with their new role.
Cognition, Connection & Care!
***
